In making something, whether it is a business, an app, a book, or art, we bring something into the world that could come only from us.
Mathieu Nebra place la communauté au cœur de sa plateforme de MOOCs | L’Atelier : Accelerating Business
Excellente initiative, très proche du #Labso également !
It’s been a while since I’ve been pondering the fifteen properties of wholeness as expressed by Christopher Alexander. Although I have yet to read one of his book, his work has transpired up to me already through the well know pattern languages.
Being found of Systems Thinking and the transdiscplinarity this permits, I couldn’t help but wonder how these 15 properties could apply to mind and mental models as well, and how it could inform our feeling of wholeness or explain when we feel like being one and belonging to a bigger, encompassing one as well. Sounds like spirituality to me, although I consider myself an atheist!
Of course, feeling also attracted to radical constructivism and social constructionism, I can safely affirm that you both are influenced by what you distinguish in the world around you and that you construct what you’re looking for. So, I hope the interpretation I give below (which is purely empirical… or my own construct) may be useful both as a way to construct that feeling of wholeness than as a way to find where it may exist when you didn’t feel it in the first place. Now, back to constructivism: where’s the difference between building and finding-and-constructing at the same time?
Here is my inner travel through the fifteen properties of wholeness. Fancy a trip with me? Here we go… Read more »
It’s with great pleasure that I propose below the first translation of our french leaflet regarding the #labso. That will be the base for the translation of the official website (http://labso.org/) once we find the time to do so.
The source document will be uploaded to some shared repository as soon as possible as well. Meanwhile, feel free to drop us a note if you have comments, requests or else @nicolasstampf or @alexis8nicolas.
Enjoy: QUAD LabSoTech v1.2 EN
First systems thinking reading during commute this year, and it’s already an excellent paper from SSI Review “The Dawn of System Leadership“. Thorough and with gems inside, I can only urge you to reserve some time to read it (it’s longer than a classical blogpost, but it more than deserves the time invested)!
The Core Capabilities of System Leaders identified in the article are:
- the ability to see the larger system;
- fostering reflection and more generative conversations;
- shifting the collective focus from reactive problem solving to co-creating the future.
The article also mentions Appreciative Inquiry, which is quite rare in the systems thinking field not to be mentioned.
Also mentioned is Otto Scharmer’s “Theory U” which starts with three openings:
- opening the mind (to challenge our assumptions),
- opening the heart (to be vulnerable and to truly hear one another),
- and opening the will (to let go of pre-set goals and agendas and see what is really needed and possible)
Ironically (well, maybe not so in the end) is the link I made in the past between the Strengths of people and Simon Sinek’s three circles in this blogpost and the work we’re developping with Alexis Nicolas in the Labso (laboratory of social technologies) (in bold are the new additions to the previous article):
- Why <–> Purpose <–> Vision (heart) of where you want to go
- How <–> Mastery <–> Ideas (mind) of how to get there
- What <–> Autonomy <–> Experience (hand) that proved to work in the past that can support you going forward
2015 seems to be off to a very good start!
Je me permets de commencer cette nouvelle année d’une part en vous la souhaitant tout à fait excellente, voire décoiffante et d’autre part en vous renvoyant vers l’excellent post de MOM21 “Nous ne croyons pas au Père Noël“.
Et si plutôt que de parler d’entreprise libérée, nous parlions d’entreprise libérante ?
Encore bonne année à tous, qu’elle vous montre le chemin de votre libération personnelle !
Indeed, I think that the opposite question is valid too and even provides a hint as to one possible answer: “why do people using systems thinking don’t reverse to another way of thinking?”
A more general question might be “why do people think the way they think?”
Excellent artice and quick exercise. Do it now! Thanks Alan for the thing!
I see a strong relationship between the two models:
- What <–> Autonomy which would mean that people are better when they are autonomous on the work they do
- How <–> Mastery which would mean people thrive when they develop their skills in how to do a job
- and Why <–> Purpose which would mean that people are best when they can make meaning of their work
Incidentally, although I haven’t yet read Pink’s book (sorry Daniel ;), I’ve always wondered how these three values connect with those of Self Determination Theory (SDT) which are: Autonomy, Competence and Relatedness.
There’s a clear link between Competence and Mastery obviously. And connecting “Relatedness” with “Purpose”, although two words with different meanings, seems to me perfectly aligned with what spiritual masters tried to teach us long ago: that life meaning mostly comes out of helping others (or trivially summarized in the saying “man is a social animal”).
What do you think?